Noilly Prattle: Politics
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Friday, March 11, 2022

 

театральная (Theatral’naya bus stop)

Mariinsky Theater Bus Stop

 

I was a bit shocked though not particularly surprised to see open hostility on social media today with this headline: 

“Facebook, Instagram to allow calls for violence against Russians”. Subhead, read: “Meta’s social media platforms have eased their hate-speech policies to permit calls for the death of some Russians.”

In other words, it’s OK to kill Russians.

At the risk of getting bashed myself, I will tell you a little story about an experience we had in Saint Petersburg, Russia.

A few years ago, we stayed in a rental apartment in St. Pete for a month while attending various opera and ballet shows at the Mariinski and other theaters in that beautiful city that has suffered so much in its history. After a visit to the Winter Palace, we were waiting for a bus on невский проспект [Nevsky Prospect] to return to театральная [Theatral’naya] the Mariinsky Theater bus stop which was near our apartment. We boarded a bus that said театральная, but we weren’t sure it was going in the correct direction and began discussing it together. I was sitting next a young man with long hair and pleasant features, my wife across the aisle.

All of a sudden, the young fellow spoke in excellent English and said that we were on the wrong bus. I replied that the sign on the bus said театральная. He said that yes, it was going there, but the long way around; it would take over an hour to get there. He said you should take the bus going in the opposite direction on Nevsky Prospect. That would take only 10 minutes. He offered to get off the bus with us and show us where to take the right bus. I protested that we couldn’t possibly inconvenience him on his way home. He said: "It’s no problem, my stop isn’t far and I can walk home." I knew he wasn’t being entirely truthful, but we let ourselves be taken by the hand. He even spoke to the bus ticket taker and asked her to return our bus fare, which she did.

He was a very engaging and friendly young man and we enjoyed chatting with him while waiting for the correct bus. When it arrived we thanked him for his kindness and boarded the bus while he disappeared into the night.

We got to театральная in 10 minutes, just as he predicted.

Monday, January 23, 2017

A House Divided

The View from the Dark Side



A recent Pew Research Center poll found that 86% of Americans think that the United States is more politically divided than it has ever been. 

The atmosphere surrounding the election and inauguration of Donald Trump justifies that depressing assessment and foreshadows continuing and unending disarray is the body politic of the nation. The question arises not only how the day to day operations of a government can be conducted under the nearly obsessive demonstrations--with no apparent constructive goal--against the administration, but, more to the point, how any nation can exist as a rational entity with such enmity among its citizens.

The specter of a house divided against itself arises in the acrimonious slogans and insults hurled across the ideological divide. The one-time peace advocating liberals, seeking revenge for the defeat of their own flawed candidate, thirst for blood—some even hoping for an assassination. 

Conservatives, gloating in the “victory” of their flawed candidate, taunt the losers to “get over it”. Liberal progressives who supposedly support divergence and tolerance post a smutty photo of two naked women in an embrace, one of whom is identified as Melania Trump. Harley Davidson bikers gather on the Mall in support of Trump and vow to take law and order into their own hands if necessary. Probably the lowest smears are against a 10-year old boy who happens to be the Trump’s youngest son. One Hollywood celebrity purports to have video evidence that Barron Trump has ASD (autism spectrum disorder) and a SNL comedy writer quips that Barron would be the “first homeschooled shooter” although he goes to a private school, and so on ad nauseam.

It is a dilemma as old as history; societies corrupted from within implode as a result of their own corruption. The expression “a house divided” is at least as old as the bible. It appears in the Gospel of Matthew: “And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto him. Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.”

Photo of Lincoln by Abraham Byers
Thomas Hobbes said that “a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand” in 1651 in his Leviathan. In 1776 in Common Sense, Thomas Paine said in relation to the Monarchy: “this hath all the distinctions of a house divided against itself . . . “

Abraham Lincoln used the expression in an 1843 speech accepting his nomination for United States Senator by the Illinois Republican Party. Lincoln’s “house divided” referred to the free and slave States. He said the Nation could not remain divided but would become all one thing or the other—all free or all slave States. He would then fight a bloody civil war to ensure that it not remain ”a house divided against itself”. But today, once again, our house is divided against itself.

Are we going to need another civil war?



Friday, January 13, 2017

Who the hell dunnit, anyway?

The view from the Dark Side.






           More bananas for the Republic

No sooner had revelations from leaks indicated that the DNC had undermined the Sanders campaign in the primaries than a drumbeat of media blitz implicating Russia in the  hacking of the DNC computers was started in what looked like a deliberate disinformation campaign to divert attention from the actual malfeasance described in the leaked emails.

As everyone knows by now, Clinton, in one of the most astounding reversals in American politics, was defeated by Donald Trump. The liberal progressives of identity politics were unable to accept defeat in what they thought was a kind of “divine right” to rule, and seemed to seek to blame anyone and anything but themselves, their poor campaign, uninspiring candidate, a lack of believable domestic policies and a belligerent attitude toward foreign policy for that defeat. And so, Russia and Vladimir Putin became the boogeyman who stiffed the Clinton campaign and caused her defeat.

The FBI’s James Comey was also targeted by the Clintonians as another cause of her defeat by the timing of his letter taking another look into her use of a private server for emails while Secretary of State. Now the US Justice Department is going to undertake a probe into the FBI’s decision about the politically incorrect timing of Mr. Comey’s letter to Congress. I wonder if there is still some hope among the Clintonians that someway, somehow, Trump is going to get kicked out of the White House that Hillary apparently feels entitled to, is owed and has a right to?

The Justice Department seems not to be in the strongest position to be making investigations into political campaign manipulations. Does anyone remember a certain meeting on an airplane on the tarmac of the Phoenix airport when Hillary was under pressure from the FBI for her private emails during the campaign when Bill Clinton and the Attorney General met for half an hour to discuss their grandchildren and, oh, by the way, decided not pursue the issue?

Well, to give the Donald equal time in the halls of smoke and mirrors, according to his recent press conference and all the great deals he’s going to make with all those terrific people, I fully expect him to do wonders and shit sea cucumbers.





Sunday, January 8, 2017

Bananas for the Republic



The view from the Dark Side







All together now, after me on the count of three: 1 - 2 – 3:  

PUTIN DID IT!

One has to wonder if the so-called “Intelligence” Services and the Mainstream Media realize what their drumbeat of unsubstantiated innuendos about “Russian hacking” of the US Presidential election makes them look like?

If their allegations are true, it makes the spies look like incompetent idiots as opposed to an effective spying organization that should have been on top of this “hacking” before it ever came near affecting the election results, and the media look like yellow journalists peddling their sensationalist stories on the supermarket tabloid racks.

If the allegations are deliberate “fake news”, then the only conclusion one can come to is that the “Intelligence” Services and the mainstream media are intentionally manipulating the American people and undermining what faith may remain in the governing integrity of the country.

Considering the new “(un)civil war” engulfing reportage in the American mainstream and alternative media there seems to be very little integrity left in the governance of the country. It has seriously begun to look as though the inmates are, indeed, in charge of the asylum. 

Friday, November 11, 2016

On a Trump Presidency

    I am not in shock!

         I was a bit stunned at first until I started to put two and two together. 

         I have been running a low key anti-Clinton campaign on my blog and Facebook page for several months. My reasons are defined there and I won't rehash old stuff here. I was, frankly, delighted to hear that she had lost since I felt that she, and not Trump, was the greater of two evils. 

         Like a friend of mine said elsewhere, "Change is good, isn't it?" Change, of course, is a two-edged sword and we will have to wait and see how it goes with Trump. But, I felt that with Hillary there would be NO change whatsoever, and I think we were sliding into a potentially expanded war spilling out of the Middle East with her continuing her ineffective and disastrous neo-con activities ("We came, we saw, he died . . . Ha-ha-ha!) which have already left such a trail of anger, hatred, death and destruction in the M.E. 

         These two articles, if read with an open mind, go a long way in explaining why and how Trump won the 2016 Presidential election.


http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/trumps-win-wasnt-ideological-it-was-brilliant/ri17505

        Many people may not like the messenger, but the message is loud and clear: the neo-liberal economic policies (finance capitalism) and neo-conservative (military imperial expansion and hegemony) foreign policies (status quo) put in place by the Reagan Administration and perfected by the Clintons were repudiated by the electorate (the ones who bothered to vote at all). To my mind it's a pendulum swing, the kind that occurs in American politics periodically. Hillary (the status quo standard bearer) was, in the end, powerless to stop the swing because she was on the wrong side of History. 

         History is moving away from American hegemony and groping (oops, that word!) towards a multi-polar world balance of power among the current great powers: the USA, China and Russia. If Trump can manage to begin that kind of foreign policy he could turn out to be a great president. As for the threat of "fascism" heaped on him, the reality is that America already is a pretty violent fascistic state with mass surveillance and militarized police forces and mass conditioning (brainwashing) through public relations and mass media. 

         I am cautiously optimistic that at least there is now a chance of some things changing on the international scene, hopefully for the better. Who knows?

         We shall see!



Monday, October 17, 2016

The Big Con

The View from the Dark Side





 

There is an odd note in the 2016 Presidential Campaign, something surrealistic about it. It almost seems as though Donald Trump is intentionally try to lose. He can’t be as dumb and clueless as he appears to be or is made out to be by his legions of detractors. Robert di Niro, in an extraordinary video, goes downright rabid in his invective laden denunciation of Trump. (Is he perhaps reliving some of his famous movie roles?) But there are a couple of interesting hints intriguingly laced among his words. He labeled Trump a con man and suggested that he was “gaming society”. Not a great stretch considering Trump’s casino background and other shady business "deals". Di Niro ends up bemoaning the impression “that this country has gotten to the point where this fool—this bozo—has wound up where he has.” The unstated implication being that a vote for Hillary Clinton will turn things around and put the country in the right (no pun intended) direction.

 

But, what if a wily con man like Trump is, in fact, gaming the system for his own ends—playing the “big con”—Henry Gondorff-style? To what purpose? There were a couple of apparently feeble attempts at “jokes” in the first presidential debate that seemingly fell flat. Hillary made the first stab at humor about “Trumped up trickle-down economics”. Perhaps the incongruity of a Hillary making a joke and the flat delivery of the punch line left it DOA. Moving forward, the Donald made an almost off the cuff remark, not an attempted joke, about how he was going to build some building (a casino?) on Pennsylvania Avenue near the White House, and was going to Washington one way or the other. The remark didn’t resonate much more than Hillary’s lame attempt at stand-up comedy.



            If nothing else, this surrealistic campaign has given Trump a lot of (free) publicity and name recognition way above and beyond what he already had. Being a “deal maker” and businessman as he claims, being a household name would give him enormous advantages for future business deals. What if his whole campaign is a brilliantly organized and executed scam to pave the way for post-election positioning (and financing) for lucrative business deals? We'll never know. The earmark of a successful con, according to Henry Gondorff in The Sting, is that conned persons stay conned. 


             Could it be that he fully intends to “go to Washington” as he hinted in the first debate? Not in the White House (who needs that headache) but in some golden Trump Tower on Pennsylvania Avenue? If so, I betcha he’d be invited over to Hill and Bill’s pad for cocktails! I thought that Bill had a gleam in his eye for Melania at the second presidential debate. And he wouldn't even have to rent the Lincoln Bedroom . . . 



Sunday, October 2, 2016

The Fake Progressive

The View from the Dark Side



Her supporters will tell you, at rather high decibels, that Hillary Clinton is the “lesser evil” because she is an experienced politician and public “servant”. In spite of much evidence to the contrary they will also tell you that she is a liberal “progressive” politician who cares deeply, deeply about the common man—much evidence in her record to the contrary.

Listed below, from the Infowars website (linked below), is a short list of some of her “accomplishments” (in Latin America) during her tenure as Secretary of State in the first term of the Obama Administration. The list seriously calls into question her claim to the mantle of friend of the middle and working classes. She has consistently undermined progressive socialist Latin American leaders and facilitated a number of right wing coups that led to the establishment of right wing governments of less than democratic persuasion. It used to be said that what was good for United Fruit was good for Latin America. It could be said now that what’s good for Finance Capitalism is good for Latin America. The Latin American fellaheen (in Kerouac’s sense) might beg to differ.

what a Clinton Presidency might look like??

Argentina:

Before Hillary: Under President Nestor Kirchner and his wife Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, Argentina’s economy improved and the working class and students prospered.

After Hillary: After former president Nestor Kirchner’s sudden death in 2010, the U.S. embassy in Buenos Aires became a nexus for anti-Kirchner activities, including the fomenting of political and labor protests against the government. Meanwhile, Clinton pressed Argentina hard on its debt obligations to the IMF, also crippling the economy.
Bolivia
Before Hillary: Bolivia’s progressive president Evo Morales, the country’s first indigenous Aymara leader, provided government support to the country’s coca farmers and miners. Morales also committed his government to environmental protection. He kept his country out of the Free Trade Area of the Americas and helped start the Peoples’ Trade Agreement with Venezuela and Cuba.
After Hillary: Clinton permitted the U.S. embassy in La Paz to stir up separatist revolts in four mostly European-descent Bolivian provinces, as well as foment labor strikes among miners and other workers in the same model used in Venezuela.
Brazil
Before Hillary: Brazil’s progressive presidents, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff, ushered in a new era for the country, with workers’ and students; rights at forefront and environmental protection and economic development for the poor major priorities.
After Hillary: Clinton’s authorization of massive electronic spying from US embassy in Brasilia and consulate general in Rio de Janeiro resulted in a “constitutional coup” against Rousseff and the Workers’ Party government, ushering in a right-wing, CIA-supported corrupt government.
Ecuador
Before Hillary: Ecuador began sharing its oil wealth with the people and the economy and the plight of the nation’s poor improved.
After Hillary: Clinton authorized a 2010 National Police coup against President Rafael Correa. The economy soon plunged as labor disputes wracked the mining and oil sectors.
Guatemala
Before Hillary: Under President Alvaro Colom, the nation’s first populist progressive president, the poor received access to health, education, and social security.
After Hillary: Clinton authorized the U.S. embassy in Guatemala to work against the 2011 election as president of Colom’s wife, Sandra Torres. Colom was succeeded by a right-wing corrupt president who resigned for corruption and then was arrested.
Honduras
Before Hillary: Emergent multi-party democracy with a populist progressive president, Manuel Zelaya. Children received free education, poor children received free school meals, interest rates were reduced, and the poorest families were given free electricity.
After Hillary: Clinton authorized a military coup d’etat against Zelaya in 2009. Clinton family “fix-it” man Lanny Davis became a public relations flack for the military dictatorship. Resulting fascist dictatorship involved in extrajudicial death squad killings of journalists, politicians, and indigenous leaders followed the “constitutional coup” against Zelaya. During 2012, Clinton ordered U.S. embassy in Tegucigalpa to work against 2013 election of Xiomara Castro de Zelaya as president.
Paraguay
Before Hillary: The country under Fernando Lugo began lifting out of poverty the nation’s rural campesinos and urban workers. Paraguay also began a steady move toward democratization after years of military  dictatorships.
After Hillary: Clinton’s 2012 “constitutional coup” against Fernando Lugo brought back into power the military-industrial oligarchy with the nation’s campesinos being forced back into poverty and repressive rule.
Venezuela
Before Hillary: Under Hugo Chavez, the country provided basic social services to its poorest of citizens. Venezuela also provided discounted gasoline to several Caribbean and Central American countries through the PetroCaribe consortium.

After Hillary: After Clinton allowed the U.S. embassy in Caracas to foment anti-Chavez labor and political protests, the country began to falter economically. After Chavez’s 2012 diagnosis of terminal cancer, the State Department stepped up pressure on Venezuela, crippling the nation’s economy and political system.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

The Dysfunctionals


The view from the Dark Side







(He said, she said), WHO WON?



     It’s sort of a moot point in a way. Watching the 

Donald and Hillary in the first presidential “debate” 

(he just wants to do business, any business; she 

wants to take everybody who doesn’t agree with her 

out) was like watching a dysfunctional couple fighting

over their dysfunctional marriage--a pretty apt 

metaphor for this whole campaign circus.



     Looks like the American people are likely to be 

the losers.


The Dysfunctionals

Thursday, September 15, 2016

The Deplorables

The Pot and the Kettle 

race for the White House


    One of these “deplorables” could be the next POTUS; 

IMAGINE!





old friends who seem to know each other only too well

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Hoo do dat voodoo dat yoo do?


airstrip on reclaimed land in the Paracels
Here in East Asia the buzz is, of course, all about the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s ruling against China (as expected) in a dispute with the Philippines over sovereignty of the Spratly Island group in the South China Sea. China, as expected, has rejected the Court’s ruling. I suspect the noise will go on at high volume for a couple of weeks but, other than a lot of noise and fist waving and chest thumping, I would be surprised if the issue came to serious blows.


The major powers don’t seem to have much of a leg to stand on. In the accompanying article it turns out that China’s rejection of the Court’s ruling is in the grand tradition of other major powers’ rejections of similar rulings. Thus, any disproportionately protracted finger pointing at China would look very much like a case of various pots calling the kettle black. 

Friday, July 1, 2016

The “lesser evil”?

     Many of my ostensibly liberal/progressive acquaintances support Mrs. Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democrat Party candidate for the Presidency of the United States of America. They support her, if I read between the lines of their arguments (or the tea leaves) correctly, not necessarily because she is a better candidate for that high office but because she isn't Donald Trump, the bogeyman of the Republican Party. 

         So, Ms. Clinton is the only “anybody but Trump” Democrat candidate still on her feet. (Bernie Sanders is, apparently, soon to be on his knees bowing to the Empress of Chaos.) None of these people may “like” Ms. Clinton, but they claim they are supporting the “lesser evil”. Although, it seems to me, evil is evil, no such thing as lesser or greater—unless you look at numbers, say, of people killed. In which case, Hillary is responsible for far more corpses than the Donald—which makes a mockery of the “lesser evil” argument for supporting her.

        Be that as it may, however, there is a much better body-less reason to posit that Ms. Clinton is no such thing as a “lesser evil”. She will almost beyond doubt (or some unforeseen event or scandal) become the next POTUS, and it will be the “indispensable” power's business as usual—neo-liberal economics and neo-conservative foreign policy. In other words the chaotic status quo of the world we now live in will be maintained and most likely expanded under the Clinton II presidency. 

        But, I digress, back to what makes Ms. Clinton the status quo candidate. It is well known that the Republican Party poohbahs have their skivvies all in a twist over the Donald's bombastic, free publicity grabbing rhetoric, because he says openly and blatantly what they only say in code words. In other words they are royally pissed off that he has spilled the pot of beans. They have not been able to unseat him either by mockery, public criticism or party politics and he will most likely vie for the presidency with Ms. Clinton, the ostensible “lesser evil” (unless some unforeseen event or scandal occurs).

        So, guess who's coming to dinner at the Democratic banquet table in retaliation? The Republican poohbahs are falling over themselves to line up in support of the Democrat candidate, Hillary Clinton herself. It is said, in some circles, that the US two-party system is a “duopoly”--two sides of the same coin. Can we say Demicans or, maybe, Repubocrats? Obviously, it makes no difference to the mice leaving the sinking SS Trump. Democrat, Schmemocrat, Hillary is the ONE, the one to uphold the status quo. The status quo's the thing, wherein we'll snuff out the campaign of the Trump.

        Here's a short list of prominent (neo-liberals and neo-cons all) Republican gentlemen flipping the coin:

Henry Paulson - former Secretary of the Treasury under George W. Bush, former Chairman of Goldman Sachs
Richard Armitage - Deputy Secretary of State under George W. Bush, triggered the notorious Plame Affair
Brent Scowcroft - Chairman of the President's Intelligence Advisory Board under George W. Bush – criticized the Iraq invasion at first, but went along because he was a “friend” of the Bushes.
Robert Kagan – called the leading neo-conservative, calls himself a “liberal interventionist”, PNAC founding member, husband of Victoria (“fuck the EU” and Hillary friend) Nuland
Max Boot – member of the PNAC, advocates “American might to promote American ideals” (his own words)

        These are only a few of the 1st magnitude right wing “stars” in Hillary's crown.


        The “lesser evil”?

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

CLANK, CLANK, CLANK.....

     That's the sound of the (Greek) can getting kicked down the road....or sold down the river.

       I had been cautiously optimistic of a potentially workable way out of the economic crisis, now disaster, in Greece, through a carefully planned and coordinated exit from the Eurozone. Given the hand offered by the growing Eurasian alliance in the form of a pipeline deal, with an advance of some 5 billion Euros, and an offer to join the BRICS New Development Bank, Greece could have parted with the Euro and possibly revived its failing economy with a new start with the vibrant growth to the East.

the fickle finger of fate
       Unfortunately, the Syriza government made no attempt to prepare for a “Grexit” from the Eurozone and naively thought it could come to terms with the austerity demands of the “Troika”. The Tsipras government merely sought to put lipstick on a pig when it should have taken the bull by the horns (apologies for all cliches, but I'm too disgusted to be inventive).

       So, whether or not the Greek parliament approves the deal that Tsipras was forced to chew and swallow, the Greeks and European Union are back to Square One, in an unsustainable and unstable political and economic madhouse. Do you hear the sound of requiem bells for Europe?




Wednesday, July 8, 2015

The West fiddles while …

... the Eurasian Union grows

     And another “new world order” is being born right under the not clueless yet seemingly congested noses of NATO. I refer to the Ufa summit in Russia being attended by the part of the planet that is not embroiled in senseless and useless wars—the SCO, the BRICS and the evolving Eurasian Union.


      I referred to the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) in a July, 2012 blog with the somewhat quixotically titled post IPI, TAPI, NATO, SCO . . . in which I imagined the planet dividing and coalescing into two competing empires that I labeled NATO and SCO—the former embroiled in endless conflicts the latter doing business (or playing while the cat's preoccupied).



       So, while the European Union is in meetings to either put out or throw gasoline on the flames of the Greek drama (only time will tell), the Eurasians are busy making business deals, adding countries to their ranks, building a new silk road trading empire and generally going on about doing business.


Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Breaking up might not be all that hard to do?

61% said NO to EU conditions
      The Greeks, having voted NO in their highly publicized referendum on whether or not to accept the EU's terms for getting more financial aid--where could they go from here?

       In a previous post [Breaking Up is Hard to Do] I speculated that one option would be for Athens to turn its eyes to the East if they are forced to drop out of the Eurozone, that the evolving Eurasian alliance could find mutual benefit in coming to Greece's rescue. 

        I ran across another blogger who is of a similar opinion and thought it would be of interest to others who have wondered how this complex situation could play out. So, I've decided to simply link to his blog and let it speak for itself.

Greece, China, and Russia – a Plan B for Greece?

Monday, June 15, 2015

Breaking Up is Hard to Do

     Are we about to witness the dreaded “Grexit” from the EU?

stencil in Athens by street artist Flip
       The grand experiment in European unity seems to be coming apart at the seams. The Greek drama may only be the tip of the iceberg with Spain, Portugal, Italy and Ireland possibly waiting in the wings. Clearly, a single currency without political unity and a reasonable economic parity is not working, with the haves clearly frustrated with the have lesses and demanding austerity from the perceived profligacy of the poorer southern cousins.

       The news out of Europe on the negotiations between its financial triumvirate (ECB, IMF, World Bank) creditors and Greece's debt repayment looks less and less promising for preventing a Greek default. Should that occur, as seems increasingly possible, what are Greece's options? Who might benefit, besides Greece itself, from a Grexit from the EU?

       I am guessing that there is a “savior” waiting in the wings, or, since this involves a Greek drama, shall we say a “deus ex machina” dropping down from the clouds to straighten everything out.

       The “new great game” of empire is at the core of much of the unrest and instability we are witnessing in our hapless 21st Century. The central arc of instability is the friction point between the main protagonists in this clash of the titans in the borderland between NATO and the emerging Russia-China entente cordiale and the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization). The Ukrainian conflict is the current flash point in this imperial struggle. The chaos in the Middle East is a kind of sub-plot in the main theme of this clash of empires.

       So, along comes little Greece, newly kicked out of the European Union. Who can it turn to for financial assistance and security? Who would be delighted to stick it back to the Western alliance for its non-stop demonization of everything Russian, especially it's tough unflappable leader? Who would love to have another warm-water port along with Sevastopol in exchange for a helping financial hand?

Greek Prime Minster Alexis Tsipras
       Greek Prime Minister Tsipras has been openly pro-Moscow, and Russia in May invited Greece to join the BRICS Development Bank. If Greece leaves the Euro and possibly the EU as well, it would not have much choice but to throw in its lot with the growing Eastern alliance, potentially opening a door to further defections by Europe's poor southern cousins.


       I'd say fasten your seat belts, we're in for a bumpy ride.